Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add filters

Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Brain Sci ; 12(5)2022 May 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1875493

ABSTRACT

Depression is often associated with co-occurring neurocognitive deficits in executive function (EF), processing speed (PS) and emotion regulation (ER), which impact treatment response. Cognitive training targeting these capacities results in improved cognitive function and mood, demonstrating the relationship between cognition and affect, and shedding light on novel targets for cognitive-focused interventions. Computerized cognitive training (CCT) is one such new intervention, with evidence suggesting it may be effective as an adjunct treatment for depression. Parallel research suggests that mindfulness training improves depression via enhanced ER and augmentation of self-referential processes. CCT and mindfulness training both act on anti-correlated neural networks involved in EF and ER that are often dysregulated in depression-the cognitive control network (CCN) and default-mode network (DMN). After practicing CCT or mindfulness, downregulation of DMN activity and upregulation of CCN activity have been observed, associated with improvements in depression and cognition. As CCT is posited to improve depression via enhanced cognitive function and mindfulness via enhanced ER ability, the combination of both forms of training into mindfulness-enhanced CCT (MCCT) may act to improve depression more rapidly. MCCT is a biologically plausible adjunct intervention and theoretical model with the potential to further elucidate and target the causal mechanisms implicated in depressive symptomatology. As the combination of CCT and mindfulness has not yet been fully explored, this is an intriguing new frontier. The aims of this integrative review article are four-fold: (1) to briefly review the current evidence supporting the efficacy of CCT and mindfulness in improving depression; (2) to discuss the interrelated neural networks involved in depression, CCT and mindfulness; (3) to present a theoretical model demonstrating how MCCT may act to target these neural mechanisms; (4) to propose and discuss future directions for MCCT research for depression.

2.
Alzheimer's & Dementia ; 17(S6):e053952, 2021.
Article in English | Wiley | ID: covidwho-1589239

ABSTRACT

Background The outbreak of the 2019 novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, causing the COVID-19 pandemic, along with the global measures used to control the spread of the disease, have been particularly stressful for older individuals. Robust evidence suggests that stress-related physiological processes may play a significant role in the onset of age-related cognitive decline and dementia, such as Alzheimer?s disease (AD). For example, previous animal and human research have shown that stress exacerbates tau pathology and subsequent cognitive impairment. One important factor determining a person?s level of stress is psychological resilience, which refers to a person?s ability to return to equilibrium when difficulties occur. As such, resilience may buffer and protect individuals against the deleterious effects of stress. The objectives of this study were to examine the relationship between psychological resilience and tau burden in cognitively unimpaired individuals, and to evaluate whether amyloid (Aß) pathology modifies this relationship. Method A total of 114 older adults (mean age=74.5;66 females (57.9%)) enrolled in the Harvard Aging Brain Study or the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living study completed an electronic survey online including measures of psychological resilience (Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale-10, where a higher score indicates greater resilience) during the COVID-19 pandemic period (May 2020). We used previously collected (mean time from survey=1.75 year) PET imaging data to assess Aß and tau burden. Results Overall, participants demonstrated high levels of resilience (mean=29.5,range=9-40). Multiple regression analyses (correcting for age, gender and time difference between survey and PET) demonstrated an interaction between resilience and amyloid on tau pathology (ß=-0.01,p=0.015, Figure1). Specifically, in Aß+ individuals (SUVR>1.324), those with higher psychological resilience also had lower tau pathology. No relationship was seen in Aß- individuals. Conclusion Our findings suggest that greater resilience during the pandemic is associated with lower tau burden in individuals at higher risk of cognitive decline (i.e. preclinical AD). Future studies are needed to determine the impact of stress and psychological resilience on prospective pathological brain changes and subsequent cognitive decline. Furthermore, resilience may be an important target for interventions to support older adults navigating stressful situations and to lessen the influence of stressors on AD pathological processes.

4.
J Psychiatr Res ; 138: 176-185, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1164123

ABSTRACT

Assessing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on perceived stress in older adults is critical to understanding how to best support elderly individuals navigating stressful situations, with the aim to lessen the impact of stressors on their brain health. Here, we collected measures on perceived stress, resilience, and behavioral coping strategies, in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, in a cross-sectional sample of 141 community dwelling older adults (mean age = 74.4 ± 8.4, 59% females) who were part of two longitudinal observational studies in Massachusetts, U.S. Our results indicate that participants demonstrated moderate levels of stress related to COVID-19 and showed relatively high levels of resilience. Higher resilience was associated with greater use of adaptive coping behaviors and less use of maladaptive coping behaviors. The use of maladaptive coping strategies was associated with more stress. Moreover, hierarchical regression analyses revealed that resilience was the strongest unique predictor of stress, thus, largely accounting for the observed coping-outcome associations. Individual differences in resilience levels moderated the effects of two coping strategies (planning and self-blame) on stress. Specifically, planning was associated with increased levels of stress for people with low resilience. In contrast, high personal resilience attenuated the negative effect of self-blame on their stress levels. Taken together, our findings suggest that resilience is critical for coping with stress during the COVID-19 pandemic. Future approaches for augmenting resilience could prove to be important potential interventions to help support older adults navigating stressful situations as well as lessen adverse effects on neurocognitive and mental health in the future.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Independent Living , Adaptation, Psychological , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL